This morning, I received a few emails from camera shops advertising their latest lenses and cameras. The sheer number of choices is truly mind-boggling. Sony, Fuji, Canon, Pentax, and Nikon all extol their virtues. While I'm not currently in the market for a new camera, I can't help but wonder: if I were, what should I consider?
The first question that comes to mind is whether to stick with DSLRs or switch to mirrorless. Mirrorless seems to be the trend these days, and since I already own several Nikon lenses, I would probably opt for Nikon along with the FTZ converter. From what I've read, the converter works very well with current Nikon lenses. Of course, I would eventually want to buy the new Z lenses.
The next question is whether I really need a new camera. I currently own a Nikon D800E and a Nikon D7000 as a backup. My photography mainly involves portraits, headshots, and some events. Would it be in my best interest to spend $5,000 on a Nikon Z8 or $7,000 on a Nikon Z9? Both these cameras are in the 45-megapixel range, but my D800E has 35 megapixels. Will I see a significant difference in the final product? I don't think so.
There's always been a discussion about whether gear matters, and we know that in certain situations, it does. For instance, if you're a birder, you need a camera with a high frame rate and a good long prime telephoto lens. But I don't do birding; I do portraits and event photography. I don't need a high frame rate or a 500mm prime lens. So, should I spend the money on a new camera or stick with what I have? I'd love to hear your opinions on this.
Comments